The League Of Nations - A Success In The 20’s, A Failure In The 30’s. How Far Do You Agree With This Satement?

The alliance Of Nations was set up subsequently World bear on One. The idea was discussed by Ameri kitty, British and French Politicians with the aims of; 1. Preventing future war, 2. retentivity the recreation, 3. Deciding on matters via. the council. It destinyed to do this by dint of penalty methods, it did this through a system called ?collective security which meant that countrys acted together to punish and renounce any country that attacked a nonher. During the 1920s the confederation Of Nations was a advantage in many areas. It kept repose surrounded by Finland and Sweden aft(prenominal) an argument erupted over the Aland Islands in 1920, it rescued from Austria from a financial crisis in 1922 and the action they took stopped a war between Greece and Bulgaria in 1925. However during the 1920s the compact in growth failed to maintain peace in some areas, an example of this is when the unify could non bind on the action to care when Italy seized the Greco-Roman island of Corfu. During the 1930s the unite of Nations was non as victoryful in holding peace. Its failures in peace keeping included- In 1931 the ?Japan and Manchurian Crisis when Japan attacked the Chinese province fo Manchuria. The League did diminished apart from criticising, which lacquer disliked and decided to leave the League in 1933. and so in 1934 a year after Hitler gained control of Germany they as well as left the League as he had always despise the organisation. Then in 1935 Italy invaded Abyssinia, the League tried to stop them via. stinting sanctions but did not include oil so they failed. after that the League was not taken seriously. The failure of the League Of Nations can in any case be placed on one classic factor- the USA. The United States Of the States did not join the League beca character death death chair Wilson has a disagreement with the US Senate over the unite, it ended with the Senate refusing to bury the USA join the Le ague. This left the federation with very d! inky power over the world. But the failure of the League could also be blamed on the fact that they would not economic consumption violence to in force the peace which was needed in some situations.

I partly agree that the League Of Nations was a success in the 20s and a failure in the 30s. I only partly agree, because although the League could be seen to have ?failed in the 30s this can really only be applied to a failure in peace keeping. They were very successful in other areas including: The Refugee Organisation which was set up by the league to help victims of war, The Labour Organisation which tried to improve land conditions and The Health Organisation which encouraged schemes to improve healthcare. All of which closing up exist as part of the United Nations today. to a fault the League cannot be seen as a complete success with a 100% success rate in the 20s each as they failed to agree on any action to take when the Italians invaded the Greek island of Corfu. So when looking back with the benefit of hindsight my persuasion is that the League was still a success in non-peace keeping areas during the 30s. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay