12 Angry Men Critical Analysis - Differences and Similarities between the book and the movie

In Twelve Angry Men, a male child is convicted of the eat up of his paternity and 12 jurymans argon chosen to decide his fate. In the beginning, every of the evidence points to him universe blameworthy. However, after a junior- ground floor man of analysis of the evidence, there is some reasonable doubt. behind all(a) of the jurors accept the son as innocent except for cardinal number very stubborn juror: juror 3. The differences and similarities amid the grade directions and the director?s duck soup selection in the behave away and in the text affect the reader?s reading material of the lowest scene where jurywoman 3 says not guilty greatly. thither are many similarities between the two versions. integrity comparison is how the jurors reacted to jurywoman 3?s resistance to the destiny of the boy creation innocent. In twain the cope with and the film, the jurors just descry at juror 3 break of surprise of his ignorance to the facts. When juryman 8 asks him why he still isn?t convinced, juror 3 says that it?s his right. He also says that he is authorise to his opinion. This law of similarity helps add to the indecision to why Juror 3 is so bent on getting the boy convicted. another(prenominal) similarity is that Juror 8 seems confident that Juror 3 will pull by his mindset of the boy being guilty.

In the play, the playwright says that Juror 8 asks Juror 3 of his arguments calmly and quietly. Juror 8 does the same in the film. Juror 8?s equanimity and quietness seems to try out that he is confident about the verdict and that he stack convince Juror 3 that the boy is innocent. The final similarity being discussed will be about how Juror 3?s tone of give tongue to affected the reader?s inference of his character. In the play the playwright?s directions... If you inadequacy to get a estimable essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.